A single bacterium can become a million bacteria in just eight hours and — in an era of MRSA and other public health concerns — disinfectant products are also multiplying: germicidal sales are projected to be more than $1 billion this year with 8,000 disinfectant products now registered with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
The EPA closely regulates germicidal product claims, particularly where the target germs cause human illness. Since all germ killers are considered pesticides, the EPA requires testing to certify manufacturers' claims for safety and effectiveness.
EPA has set up test protocols for three disease-causing or pathogenic germs: Staphylococcus aureus (or "Staph"), Salmonella choleraesuis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Disinfectants that kill all three of these bacteria are called "Hospital disinfectants." Products that kill only Staph and Salmonella are called "General disinfectants," and products which kill either one or the other — Staph or Salmonella — are referred to as "Limited disinfectants."
Product effectiveness is gauged by its ability to kill certain benchmark microbes. For example, if a germicide kills Pseudomonas, it's assumed that all weaker microbes will also be killed. There are no specific EPA-certified claims for killing some known disease-causing germs, but it's commonly assumed that if Pseudomonas dies, so does a slew of less-virile microbes.
Mycobacterium tuberculosis (the bacterium that causes Tuberculosis) — even tougher to kill than Pseudomonas — is another and more demanding benchmark. (OSHA's Bloodborne Pathogens Standard 29 CFR 1910.1030 originally specified a tuberculocidal disinfectant for surfaces contaminated with blood/body fluids, though the rule has been relaxed somewhat to permit other disinfectants where appropriate.)
Interestingly, even though Tuberculosis is not transmitted by surfaces, it is used as a benchmark for the effectiveness of hard surface disinfectants. According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC):
Potency against Mycobacterium tuberculosis has been recognized as a substantial benchmark. However, the tuberculocidal claim is used only as a benchmark to measure germicidal potency. Tuberculosis is not transmitted via environmental surfaces but rather by the airborne route. Accordingly, use of such products on environmental surfaces plays no role in preventing the spread of tuberculosis.
However, because mycobacteria have among the highest intrinsic levels of resistance among the vegetative bacteria, viruses, and fungi, any germicide with a tuberculocidal claim on the label is considered capable of inactivating a broad spectrum of pathogens, including such less-resistant organisms as bloodborne pathogens (e.g., HBV, HCV, and HIV). It is this broad-spectrum capability, rather than the product's specific potency against mycobacteria, that is the basis for protocols and regulations dictating use of tuberculocidal chemicals for surface disinfection.
Specialized terms on germicidal product labels describe conditions of use that improve or impair disinfectant effectiveness. Here's what they mean.
Dwell Time: Many disinfectants work best — and live up to germicide label claims — when allowed to work for several to ten minutes before wiping or rinsing.
Organic Load: Disinfectants are deactivated by many organic soils — for example, blood serum, protein, food and body waste — and may require two applications to disinfect. The first removes the bulk of any organic soiling, the second application disinfects.
The statement "effective against stated germs in the presence of 5% serum or 5% organic load or bioburden" acknowledges that the product will still work well in the presence of a small amount of organic matter, but reminds end-users of the need for an initial cleaning with disinfectant to remove the worst soil. The statement "kills germs on precleaned environmental surfaces" is basically reiterating the point.
Water Hardness: Many disinfectants don't work well in hard water. The newest quats work fairly well in hard water, so a typical quat formula label might read "effective in 400 parts per million (PPM) hard water."
PPM (parts per million) Active Ingredients: This is an indicator of disinfectant strength. The more PPM of active ingredients indicated after the product is properly diluted ("in use dilution") often the more effective it is.
Simply applying a proven disinfectant and allowing proper dwell time will not always kill the bacteria present, for example, under the rim of toilet bowls. Bacteria can produce a protective slime or biofilm which prevents disinfectants from getting in. Such surfaces need to be agitated with a brush or scrubber to break up the slime barrier.
According to Science News Magazine, "Scientists found Pseudomonas [embedded in slime] could survive in bottled iodine solution for up to 15 months."
The Right Mix
Getting the dilutions correct is not only important for proper disinfection--it is a legal requirement. That's why labels typically read, "It is a violation of federal law to use this product in a manner inconsistent with its labeling." The use and claims of disinfectants are regulated by the EPA under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act. To comply with that, it's important that disinfectants be used only as specified on the label and manufacturer's literature.
Disinfectants - Which Germs are We Killing?: Created on November 11th, 2007. Last Modified on November 11th, 2007
A 25-year veteran in the housekeeping and cleaning industry, Allen Rathey began his career by establishing a home and commercial cleaning service in the early 1980s. After 10 years of first-hand experience, he transitioned from cleaning to consulting, providing advice and marketing services through his communications company, now InstructionLink/JanTrain, Inc. (ILJT). ILJT helps a wide range of cleaning industry organizations from start-up businesses to Fortune 500 companies, develop credible marketing messages, medical and scientific advisory boards, scientific communications and related outreach. The goal? Refine and validate products and processes to produce better and healthier indoor environments, then effectively deliver best practice information to the public.
Rathey's passion for educating the marketplace about the life-enhancing, health and other benefits of effective cleaning and housekeeping, prompted him to start The Housekeeping Channel in 2004. The Housekeeping Channel provides consumers with better, faster and healthier housekeeping tips and in-depth information. The Housekeeping Channel's portfolio of best practice advice comes from a range of leading professionals, including cleaning experts, professional executive housekeepers and professional cleaning services, scientists and doctors, environmental specialists and organizational and time-management consultants. More than 50,000 unique visitors go to the Housekeeping Channel each month, many spending more than an hour per visit.
Rathey is also the president of The Healthy House Institute, an online resource for a better, safer indoor environments.
Allen has been tapped as a housekeeping expert by The New York Times, U.S. News and World Report, BrandWeek Magazine, Real Simple, WebMD, and other national media. He has written articles for more than two-dozen international trade and consumer magazines.
Fill in the form below for basic site access (commenting, etc).
Looking for more? Become a CIRI Member...