The Cleaning Industry Research Institute (CIRI), in support of science-based practices for better cleaning, is committed to driving real world, holistic, comprehensive research rather than “research” designed to yield a single, isolated set of “facts” to drive a marketing agenda. This commitment is illustrated by the CIRI research conducted in support of the ISSA Clean Standard: K-12 Schools.
How Science Helps Cleaning
Science can help us clean better, if we let it. Here is what to do:
An October, 2013 article in The Economist, “Trouble at the Lab” indicates that:
When "Research" Hurts Cleaning, or What Not to Do
Sometimes companies conduct studies in which:
CIRI aims to correct this problem by making its resources available to support the cleaning sector with bona fide, well-vetted science.
Careful research in cleaning science should yield repeatable results that stand up under scrutiny.
For more information, visit http://www.ciriscience.org.
Bad Science is a Societal Problem
There are public health, credibility and professional issues at stake, but the cleaning field is not alone in facing challenges.
According to The New Yorker article, “Cleaning Up Science” -- "Recent examination of fifty-three medical studies found that further research was unable to replicate forty-seven of them. All too often, scientists muck about with … studies, and keep tweaking something until they get the result they were hoping to achieve. Unfortunately, each fresh effort increases the risk of getting the right result for the wrong reason, and winding up with a spurious vision of something that doesn’t turn out to be scientifically robust, like a cancer drug that seems to work in trials but fails to work in the real world."
The New Yorker states that part of the solution is to:
“Restructure the incentives…For many reasons, science has become a race for the swift, but not necessarily the careful…Instead of, for example, rewarding scientists largely for the number of papers they publish—which credits quick, sloppy results that might not be reliable—we might reward scientists to a greater degree for producing solid, trustworthy research that other people are able to successfully replicate and then extend….More full disclosure of experimental methods can help, too.”
It adds: “Recognize that no single study ever proves anything. Without replication, all results should be taken as preliminary.”
And finally: “Here, both science and the media are complicit; there is a tendency to trumpet every new finding as if it proved something, but most new studies are merely evidence toward a conclusion, not the conclusion itself. Everyone—from the public, to the media, to Congress, to the scientists themselves—needs to be more patient.”
How Science Can Help Us Clean Better (and when it cannot): Created on July 19th, 2014. Last Modified on July 19th, 2014
Fill in the form below for basic site access (commenting, etc).
Looking for more? Become a CIRI Member...