CIRI Research
LinkedIn

Join the Discussion on LinkedIn!


Support CIRI!

 

We Support CIRI - Cleaning Industry Research Institute

 

Show your support of CIRI with the 'CIRI Supporter' logo, available for display on your Web site upon joining CIRI.

 

Join today and help CIRI advance the cause of cleaner, more productive, and healthier indoor environments through scientific research!

Popular Topics

Did You Know?

 

Mops and Buckets Spread Germs

 

"Bucket solutions become contaminated almost immediately during cleaning, and continued use of the solution transfers increasing numbers of microorganisms to each subsequent surface to be cleaned.

 

"...Another source of contamination in the cleaning process is the cleaning cloth or mop head, especially if left soaking in dirty cleaning solutions."

 

CDC

Article

Comparison of Sampling Methods for the Assessment of Indoor Microbial Exposure

 

By Frankel M, Timm M, Hansen EW, Madsen AM

 

Abstract 

 

Indoor microbial exposure has been related to allergy and respiratory disorders. However, the lack of standardized sampling methodology is problematic when investigating dose-response relationships between exposure and health effects. In this study, different sampling methods were compared regarding their assessment of microbial exposures, including culturable fungi and bacteria, endotoxin, as well as the total inflammatory potential (TIP) of dust samples from Danish homes. The Gesamtstaubprobenahme (GSP) filter sampler and BioSampler were used for sampling of airborne dust, whereas the dust fall collector (DFC), the electrostatic dust fall collector (EDC), and vacuum cleaner were used for sampling of settled dust. The GSP assessed significantly higher microbial levels than the BioSampler, yet measurements from both samplers correlated significantly. Considerably higher levels of fungi, endotoxin, and TIP were found in the EDC compared with the DFC, and regarding fungi, the EDC correlated more strongly and significantly with vacuumed dust than the DFC. Fungi in EDC and vacuum dust correlated most strongly with airborne dust, and in particular, the measurements from the EDC associated well with those from GSP. Settled dust from the EDC was most representative of airborne dust and may thus be considered as a surrogate for the assessment of indoor airborne microbial exposure.

 

Practical Implications

 

Significant discrepancies between sampling methods regarding indoor microbial exposures have been revealed. This study thus facilitates comparison between methods and may therefore be used as a frame of reference when studying the literature or when conducting further studies on indoor microbial exposure. Results also imply that the relatively simple EDC method for the collection of settled dust may be used as an alternative to otherwise tedious and time-consuming airborne dust sampling.

 

© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.


Indoor air. 2012 Feb 2.

 

Authors


Frankel M, Timm M, Hansen EW, Madsen AM

 

The National Research Center for the Working Environment, Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.

 

PMID: 22299641

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Comparison of Sampling Methods for the Assessment of Indoor Microbial Exposure:  Created on April 19th, 2012.  Last Modified on April 19th, 2012
Disclaimer ↓

The Cleaning Industry Research Institute (CIRI) is a 501.c.3 not-for-profit scientific, educational and research organization that applies science to the practice and improvement of cleaning and maintenance.

 

This abstract/brief is presented under the recognized "fair use" doctrine with respect to article copyright and intellectual property. Readers are encouraged to secure the full article from the originating publication source. Articles also may be obtained through a librarian, an information specialist or inter-library loan. In cases where payment is required under copyright it can be processed through a reference library or the Copyright Clearance Center at www.copyright.com.

 

CIRI provides no warranty, expressed or implied, and assumes no legal liability for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information disclosed on its site. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of CIRI principals, executives, science advisors or affiliates.

 

Comments

Comments

Members

Member Access

Sorry, only CIRI Members are allowed to comment.

 

If you're a member, sign in:

Not a CIRI Member? Join Today to tap CIRI knowledge and networking resources

Sorry, there are currently no comments on this article...

 
 

 

 

 

Popular Topics: Swine Flu | H1N1 | MRSA | Staph | Norovirus | Flu | E. Coli | C. Difficile | Salmonella | Green Cleaning | Cleaning for Health | Nosocomial Infections | Disinfection | Bacteria | Viruses | Indoor Air Quality | Asthma | Allergies | Allergen | Mold

 

© 2007-2013 The Cleaning Industry Research Institute
A 501.c.3 not-for-profit scientific, educational and research institute
1988 Central Avenue
Albany, NY 12205

Phone: (888)285-2474
Fax: (518)456-6445
Privacy Policy | Shipping Policy | Return Policy & Procedure

This site donated by:

Kaivac Cleaning Systems®